Peer review is vital to
the quality of published research. All papers submitted to
ICCFI 2023 will go through the peer review process before
publication.
How does it work?
Peer review is a process in which a scientific paper is
evaluated by a group of experts in the same field to make
sure it meets the necessary standards for acceptance and
publication.
The Technical Program Chair will appoint a Technical Program
Committee. And the Technical Program Committee collaborates
to review and discuss submitted papers.
The Technical Program Chair is ultimately responsible for
the selection of every accepted paper. ICCFI 2023 uses
double-blind review mode. In double-blind, neither the
author nor the reviewers are aware of each other's identity.
What Are Reviewers Looking For?
Learn what is important during peer review. Make sure to
cover all the topics in conference paper.
During the peer review process, reviewers look for:
Scope: Is the paper appropriate for the scope of this
conference? Novelty: Is this original material distinct from
previous publications? Validity: Is the study well designed and executed? Data: Are the data reported, analyzed, and
interpreted correctly? Clarity: Are the ideas expressed clearly, concisely,
and logically? Compliance: Are all ethical and publication
requirements met? Advancement: Is this a significant contribution to
the field?
Peer Review Decisions
Conference peer review occurs within a fixed window of time.
You may receive one of three possible decisions:
Accept: Your paper will be published without edits.
You may be asked to upload final camera-ready files or to
sign a copyright form. Accept with revision: Your paper will be accepted
after you implement edits suggested by the reviewers. You
will be asked to provide a revised version. Reject: Your paper will not be presented at the
conference or published in the conference proceedings.
